Nicholson v. Whitlock.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Gags, J., Union, April, 1899. Action by Emslie Nicholson, administrator de bonis non of estate of F. G. Whitlock, against Mary Whitlock and his other heirs at law, and creditors. Rebecca E. Nicholson, as executrix, and Mary Whitlock, parties of record, and A. E. Hardin and W. E. Moorhead, creditors proving claims, appeal. The Circuit Judge says in reference to the bond held by Wm.
Read the full summary
Before Gags, J., Union, April, 1899. Action by Emslie Nicholson, administrator de bonis non of estate of F. G. Whitlock, against Mary Whitlock and his other heirs at law, and creditors. Rebecca E. Nicholson, as executrix, and Mary Whitlock, parties of record, and A. E. Hardin and W. E. Moorhead, creditors proving claims, appeal. The Circuit Judge says in reference to the bond held by Wm. A. Nicholson (deceased), administrator: The master has reported a balance of $2,474.51 due on the Nicholson bond and mortgage, dated 18th February, 1885. I have been unable to ascertain how that result was…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
So much of the statement of facts set out in the record as is necessary for a proper understanding of the questions involved is as follows: “This action was begun by the service of summons and complaint, April 27, 1896. The action was by W. A. Nicholson in his own right, and as administrator of E. G. Whitlock, deceased, and was for sale of lands in aid of assets.' E. G. Whitlock died 8th August, 1895, and W. A. Nicholson was appointed his *39administrator, August 31, 1895. The complaint alleges insufficiency of the personal estate to pay…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Richardson v. McCloskeyTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- Bell v. MackeySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1939
- Epperson v. JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
- Beacham v. RossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
- Ross v. BeachamDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1940
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.