Legal Opinion

Ross v. Beacham

District Court, W.D. South Carolina

Decided May 18, 1940No. 40PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYCHE, District Judge.

Plaintiffs bring this action for an accounting and seek judgment against W. C. Beacham individually and as administrator of the Estate of W. G. Ross, deceased, and his surety for loss caused by his failure to make undistributed annual balances productive, the payment of excessive bond premiums, and for refund of commissions unlawfully received by him in the management of the estate. The defendants deny the allegations of negligence and improper management and plead a judgment in the case of W. C. Beacham, as Administrator, etc., et al., v. W. Rushton Ross, as Executor,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Waterman v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Sutton v. EnglishSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Borer v. ChapmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Johnston-Crews Co. v. FolkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. Epperson v. JacksonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Small v. FrickDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1941
  2. Equitable Trust Co. v. SchwebelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. M. A. v. WALL TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
  4. Pawnee Leasing Corporation v. Alok SharmaDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API