State v. Warren
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The defendant, Raymond F. Warren, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of sexual assault in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-72a (a) (1). On appeal, the defendant claims that the trial court improperly admitted the testimony of a Norwich police officer under the constancy of accusation doctrine, beyond the parameters set forth in State v. Troupe, 237 Conn. 284, 677 A.2d 917 (1996) (enbanc). We disagree and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts and procedural history are relevant to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. TroupeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- State v. Francis D.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. SpiegelmannConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. SamuelsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
- State v. DeJesusConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. BoydConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- State v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- State v. ThomasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.