Scroggins v. Uniden Corp. of America
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NEAL, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiff-appellant, Robert E. Scroggins (Scroggins), has perfected his interlocutory appeal from the denial by the Bartholomew Circuit Court of his attempt to discover any subjective self-critical analysis of products filed by defendant-appellees, Uniden Corporation of America and American Telephone and Telegraph Company (Uniden), with the Consumers Products Safety Commission (CPSC).
We reverse.
STATEMENT OF THE RECORD
This is a products liability action involving the use of Uniden's Nomad 400 Cordless Telephone. Scroggins alleges that he suffered a loss of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Banks v. Lockheed-Georgia Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1971
- Hunter v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
- McClain v. Mack Trucks, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
- O'Connor v. Chrysler Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1980
- Jamison v. Storer Broadcasting Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1981
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Terre Haute Regional Hospital, Inc. v. TruebloodIndiana Supreme Court · 1992
- DeMoss Rexall Drugs v. DobsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
- Kavanaugh v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Lamitie v. Emerson Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Popovich v. Indiana Department of State RevenueIndiana Tax Court · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.