Legal Opinion

Dahl Ex Rel. Dahl v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided December 12, 2002No. 14-02-00279-CVPublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN S. ANDERSON, Justice.

Appellee, the State of Texas, initiated eminent domain proceedings for a whole taking of a 1.004 acre tract of land and any improvements on the tract. The land had previously been conveyed to Leonidas Ve-zos by the Victoria Koci Malcolm Estate Trust, with the Trust retaining the improvements and two purchase-money mortgages. In the eminent domain proceedings, the State joined appellant Ted E. Dahl, Trustee of the Trust, along with Vezos and other parties.

The Trust and appellant Rosalie Dahl (“appellants”) counterclaimed against the State, alleging inverse…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Business v. Texas Air Control BoardTexas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Bland Independent School District v. BlueTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Mayhew v. Town of SunnyvaleTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Kassen v. HatleyTexas Supreme Court · 1994

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Harris County v. SykesTexas Supreme Court · 2004
  2. City of Houston v. Petroleum Traders Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2008
  3. Tara Partners, Ltd. v. City of South Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  4. Robinson v. Alief Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  5. Anderson v. City of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API