Legal Opinion

State v. Hebert

Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 2006No. 25754PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court By

WATANABE, J.

Defendant-Appellant Frederick Ryan Hebert (Hebert or Mr. Hebert) appeals from the judgments entered by the District Court of the First Circuit1 (the district court or the court) on March 19, 2003, following a bench trial, convicting and sentencing him for operating a vehicle under the influence of an intoxicant (OVUII), in violation of Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 291E-61(a)(l) (Supp.2004),2 and disregarding a red signal, in violation of HRS § 291C-32(a)(3)(A) (1993).3

*285Hebert’s sole contention on appeal is that the district court erred as a matter of law…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Philip J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. C.J.W.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. CJWMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. Philip J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. ChaplinMontana Supreme Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API