Legal Opinion
Philip J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's Services
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided December 2, 2011No. S-14193PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHRISTEN, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Philip is the father of seven children who were adjudicated to be children in need of aid. On appeal, he claims that his right to due process was violated because he was unaware that the State would seek adjudication findings at the conclusion of a hearing that started as a contested probable cause (temporary custody) hearing. He also argues that he was denied due process because he was not allowed to present a closing argument. We hold that Philip was not denied due process because he had notice that the State was seeking adjudication findings, because…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Aguchak v. Montgomery Ward Co., Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1974
- D.M. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re the Estate of FieldsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Philip J. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- del Rosario v. ClareAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Patrick v. Municipality of Anchorage, Anchorage Transportation CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Amy S. v. State, Department of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
- Clementine F. v. State, Dept. of Health & Social Services, Office of Children's ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.