Legal Opinion

Shotts v. McKinney

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1906No. 5,886PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Erom Superior Court of Tippecanoe County; Iíenry H. Vinton, Judge. Action by Ira A. Sbotts against Joseph A. McKinney. Erom a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Eobinson, O. J.

Appellant sued to recover damages for an injury resulting from alleged negligence of appellee. The jury returned a verdict for appellee, upon which judgment was rendered. Overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial is assigned as error. The only questions argued *102by appellant’s counsel are, the court’s refusal to give instructions two and three, requested by appellant, and requiring appellant, over objection, to answer a certain question while testifying as a witness.

1. Appellee’s counsel argue that no question is presented by the refusal of the court to give these…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co. v. ConoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Spencer v. RobbinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. City of South Bend v. HardyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Hamlet Hay Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Wilson v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ayrshire Coal Co. v. WestIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Goldberg v. CoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API