Goldberg v. Coffman
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Sullivan Circuit Court; William H. Bridwell, Judge. Action by Philena Coffman against Aaron Goldberg, in which C. Ed. Coffman, administrator with the will annexed, was substituted after the death of the original plaintiff. From a judgment for plaintiff, the defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
Action by Philena Coffman against appellant for rents claimed to be due under the terms of a lease by her to appellant, the stipulations of which we do not need to state.
During the pendency of the action in the trial court, Philena Coffman died, and appellee as administrator with the will annexed was substituted as plaintiff. There was a trial by jury which resulted in a verdict and judgment for appellee.
*441. *43The only error assigned is the court’s action in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. Appellant’s *44first reason presented for a new trial is that the verdict of the jury is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Reynolds v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Guthiel v. DowIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Jennings v. IngleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.