Legal Opinion

Monarch Assurance P.L.C. And Thomas Patrick Denton Taylor v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided April 5, 2001No. 99-5052PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Per curiam

In this contract action, plaintiffs allege that they lent a secret agent of the United States money to support a clandestine CIA operation, and have not been paid for their efforts. The United States denies responsibility, and invokes the state secrets privilege to avoid responding to plaintiffs’ demands for discovery. The United States Court of Federal Claims concluded that, even if the individual alleged to be a secret agent was in fact such an agent, there was an insufficient showing that the agent had authority to contract on behalf of the United States. The court granted summary judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Trauma Service Group v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  4. City of El Centro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. Totten v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Three S Consulting v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  2. Liberty Ammunition, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  3. Rq Squared, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  4. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated August 9, 2000District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  5. Council for Tribal Employment Rights v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API