Legal Opinion

Lewis v. CIGNA Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 7, 2004No. 97-05360, 97-05050 and 97-00071; A106117PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

This workers’ compensation case comes before us on remand from the Oregon Supreme Court. Lewis v. CIGNA Ins. Co., 336 Or 125, 79 P3d 882 (2003). The question it now presents is whether an insurer may deny a claim if the claimant refuses to participate or cooperate in an Insurer Medical Exam (IME). The Workers’ Compensation Board held that the insurer could do so. We agree and affirm.

The relevant historical and procedural events giving rise to this case can be summarized as follows. Claimant filed claims for compensation following back injuries. Insurer arranged for claimant to take an IME. He…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. GuzekOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. PearsonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. SAIF Corp. v. DuboseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  5. SAIF Corp. v. DuboseOregon Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CIGNA InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. SAIF Corp. v. DuboseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API