Legal Opinion

SAIF Corp. v. Dubose

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 2003No. WCB 97-01993; CA A103853; SC S47731PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRiggs, J.

In this workers’ compensation case, SAIF Corporation (SAIF), the insurer, denied a claim for benefits because claimant had failed to cooperate with SAIF’s investigation. Claimant requested a hearing, using the standardized form that the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) provides for such requests, but she did not check a box on the hearing request form to indicate that SAIF had denied her claim for “worker noncooperation.” Instead, claimant checked the box to indicate that SAIF had denied her claim on “compensability complete claim denial” grounds. At the hearing, SAIF argued that claimant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Norton v. State Compensation DepartmentOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. SAIF Corp. v. DuboseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. Mabon v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 1999

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lewis v. CIGNA InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  2. SAIF Corp. v. WartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  3. Lewis v. CIGNA InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  4. SAIF Corp. v. DuboseCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  5. SAIF Corp. v. WartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API