Legal Opinion

Schustack v. Herren

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 1, 1956No. 277, Docket 23951PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

The facts in this case are amply set out in Judge Sugarman’s opinion, reported at 136 F.Supp. 850, and we need not repeat them here.

1. No one can reasonably doubt that the Army has the power to discharge without a hearing and without assigning any reason; such power is indispensable to the effective management of the armed services and to the national defense; and with the exercise of that power no court can properly interfere. But plaintiff argues — contrary to Judge Youngdahl’s decision in Harmon v. Brucker, D.C.D.C., 137 F.Supp. 475— that the federal courts have…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Blackmar v. GuerreSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Marshall v. WymanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1955
  4. Patterson v. LambSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States Ex Rel. Vassel v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Stephanie CRAWFORD, Appellant, v. General Robert E. CUSHMAN, Jr., Commandant, United States Marine Corps, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
  2. Hooper v. HartmanDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958
  3. Texas American Asphalt Corporation v. WalkerDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1959
  4. Reed v. FrankeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1961
  5. Bernstein v. HerrenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API