Legal Opinion
Hooper v. Hartman
District Court, S.D. California
Decided May 10, 1958No. 2027PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.
Plaintiff, by Oscar F. Irwin, Esq., filed his amended complaint herein containing two causes of action, praying in the first cause of action for a writ of prohibition and for mandatory and prohibitive injunctive relief and in the second cause of action for the convening of a District Court of three judges, for injunctive relief and for a declaratory judgment.
Defendant, C.C. Hartman, appearing by the United States Attorney by Jordan A. Dreifus, Assistant United States Attorney, filed a motion to dismiss and/or, in the alternative, for summary judgment, and…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Myers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States Ex Rel. Toth v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Shaughnessy v. PedreiroSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- California Water Service Co. v. City of ReddingSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Williams v. FanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. GuaglioneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
- Selden G. Hooper v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Elmwood v. ElmwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Watson v. WatsonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1976
- Selden G. Hooper v. C. C. Hartman, Rear Admiral Usn, Commandant, Eleventh Naval DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.