Alvarado v. Rosenberg

CAYTON, Chief Judge.

Defendants appeal from a judgment entered against them in an action on a promissory note. Only two questions of importance are involved.

Their first statement of error deals with the action of the trial court in striking their demand for jury trial. We shall recite the circumstances which led up to that ruling. Defendants filed their jury demand before the return day, but did not accompany it by an answer as required by Municipal Court Rule 8, Part II.1 Instead they filed a motion for a better bill of particulars, requesting a copy of the note and a statement of the amount…