Legal Opinion
Wilson & Co. v. Ward
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 28, 1941No. 6537PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUHRING, Justice.
The defendant failed to serve a demand for a jury trial in the manner prescribed by Rule 38(b), 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, and now moves the court to order a trial by a jury of the issues involved on the ground (a) that the demand was inadvertently overlooked, (b) that an order at this time for a jury trial will not interfere with the orderly disposition of the court’s docket, nor cause appreciable delay, and (c) that it will not prejudice the rights of the opposite party. The motion is supported by affidavit of counsel stating, among other matters, “that I…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Burke v. CanfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Buggeln & Smith, Inc. v. Standard Brands, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1939
- Alfred Hofmann, Inc. v. Textile Mach. WorksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- Gruskin v. New York Life Ins.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
3Cited by8 opinions
- Institute for Policy Studies v. United States Central Intelligence AgencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Kass v. BaskinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- Tavoulareas v. PiroDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1981
- Garcia v. FreyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Sweeney v. VenezianoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.