Legal Opinion
United States v. Llera Plaza
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 13, 2002No. Cr. 98-362-10, 98-362-11, 98-362-12PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLAK, District Judge.
In the government’s list of witnesses expected to be called at the upcoming trial, on drug and murder charges, of defendants Carlos Ivan Llera Plaza, Wilfredo Martinez Acosta and Victor Rodriguez, there are four Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) fingerprint examiners and one FBI fingerprint specialist. To bar the testimony of these anticipated witnesses, the defendants filed a Motion to Preclude the United States from Introducing Latent Fingerprint Identification Evidence. The government responded with a Combined Motion in Limine to Admit Latent Print…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Wolf v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Henslee v. Union Planters National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Fred Lauzon v. Senco Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Russeau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
- United States v. Byron MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Patrick Leroy CrispCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. MonteiroDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2006
- United States v. Gerald Dean JanisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.