Legal Opinion

United States v. Patrick Leroy Crisp

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided March 31, 2003No. 01-4953PublishedCited by 142 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the majority opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINS joined. Judge MICHAEL wrote a dissenting opinion.

OPINION

KING, Circuit Judge:

Patrick Leroy Crisp appeals multiple convictions arising from an armed bank robbery carried out in Durham, North Carolina, on June 13, 2001. Crisp maintains that his trial was tainted by the Government’s presentation of inadmissible expert testimony. His appeal presents a single question: whether the disciplines of forensic fingerprint analysis and forensic handwriting analysis satisfy the criteria for expert opinion…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. Kathleen Kremser JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. People v. JenningsIllinois Supreme Court · 1911

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by142 opinions

  1. Russeau v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. Anderson v. Westinghouse Savannah River Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. Byron MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. JohnCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010

137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API