Legal Opinion

Graves v. Estabrook

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided March 3, 2003No. 2002-118PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuggan, J.

The plaintiff, Catrina Graves, appeals a ruling by the Superior Court (.Hampsey, J.) granting the defendant, Franklin L. Estabrook’s, motion to dismiss her complaint for negligent infliction of emotional distress. Estabook argued that because Graves was not related by blood or marriage to the decedent, but was only the decedent’s fiancée, she cannot recover for negligent infliction of emotional distress. We reverse and remand.

We rely upon the facts pled by Graves. In reviewing a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, we assume the truth of all facts…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Sinn v. BurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Paugh v. HanksOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Krouse v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Aumand v. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical CenterDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2009
  2. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance v. CreteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  3. Blackthorne Group, Inc. v. Pines of Newmarket, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  4. Smith v. ToneyIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Dewyngaerdt v. Bean Insurance Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API