Legal Opinion
Pix Shoes of Miami, Inc. v. Howarth
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 11, 1967No. 66-506PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
201 So.2d 80 (1967)
PIX SHOES OF MIAMI, INC., a Florida Corporation, Appellant,
v.
Elizabeth HOWARTH and Richard Howarth, Her Husband, Appellees.
No. 66-506.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
July 11, 1967.
West & Goldman, Miami, for appellant.
Granat, Rosenblatt & Roemer, Joe N. Unger, Miami, for appellees.
Before CHARLES CARROLL, C.J., and BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.
BARKDULL, Judge.
This is a negligence case in which the defendant in the trial court seeks review of an adverse final judgment, entered on a jury verdict, and the denial by the trial judge of certain post-trial motions.
On…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Cloud v. FallisSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Marks v. State Road DepartmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- North v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Jackson Grain Co. v. HoskinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- Great Northern Ry. Co. v. BenjaminMontana Supreme Court · 1915
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jones v. Airport Rent-A-Car, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977
- Bieley v. Jennings Construction Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Niebla v. Flying Tigers Line, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Holden v. DyeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Greens to You, Inc. v. GavelekDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.