Legal Opinion

Holden v. Dye

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 3, 1969No. K-125PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a negligence case arising out of an automobile collision. Appellants, plaintiffs below, having suffered an adverse jury verdict, moved for a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence. The motion was denied and plaintiffs now seek reversal of the order denying a new trial.

The facts underlying this action are brief. Appellant had been parked in the middle of the block on Pace Boulevard one-hundred-fifty feet south of Blount Street in Pensacola. At this point, Pace was a four-lane artery, two going in each direction. Appellant drove off…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gulle v. BoggsSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  2. McNulty v. CusackDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958
  3. Pix Shoes of Miami, Inc. v. HowarthDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Cosby-Hodges Milling Co. v. SheffieldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tozier v. JarvisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Eppler v. Tarmac America, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2000
  3. Darr v. AglinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  4. Community Cabs, Inc. v. GrissettDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API