Niebla v. Flying Tigers Line, Inc.

This is a negligence case in which the plaintiff below seeks reversal of an order for a new trial that resulted from juror testimony indicating that the jury’s verdict had been arrived at by means which would make it a quotient verdict. Because neither party disputes the determination of liability, we reverse the order for a new trial as to liability but affirm the order as to all other issues.

Niebla prevailed against Flying Tigers Line, Inc. for personal injuries he incurred. Following entry of judgment, the defendant filed a motion to recall the jurors to interrogate them, alleging that…