Bloomfield v. Pinn
Nebraska Supreme Court
Appeal from the district court for Kearney county: Harry S. Dungan, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
Action for slander. Plaintiff had judgment in the district court, and defendant has appealed. For convenience the parties will be designated as plaintiff and defendant. The plaintiff’s petition contained nine counts, or causes of action, based on slanderous words spoken by the defendant of and concerning the plaintiff to many different persons, and on that number of occasions. The slanderous words set out in the petition will not be, reproduced in this opinion because they are unfit for publication. It is sufficient to say that they charged plaintiff with unchastity, and asserted that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boldt v. BudwigNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Bee Publishing Co. v. World Publishing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1900
- Gribble v. Pioneer Press Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Larrabee v. Minnesota Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- Frazier v. . McCloskeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- McCune v. NeitzelNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Boyd v. BoydSupreme Court of Virginia · 1914
- Hutchens v. KukerNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
- Fitzgerald v. YoungNebraska Supreme Court · 1911
- Hall v. VakinerNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.