Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Boyd

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 11, 1914PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Corporation Court of the city of Lynchburg in an action of trespass on the case. To a judgment for the plaintiff for one-half of the amount found in her favor by the jury, the plaintiff assigns error.

1Opinion of the CourtBuchanan, J.

The only question raised in the petition for this writ of error is whether or not the corporation court erred in holding that it would set aside the verdict and grant a new trial unless the plaintiff would accept $1,500 in lieu of the verdict in her favor for $3,000.

The plaintiff accepted the $1,500 under protest. The motion of the defendant to set aside the verdict because it was contrary to the law and the evidence and because the damages awarded were excessive, and grant a new trial, was overruled and judgment entered for the $1,500. To that judgment this writ of error was awarded upon the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Douglass v. TouseyNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. Norfolk & Western Railroad v. H. I. ShottSupreme Court of Virginia · 1895
  3. Corr v. LewisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907
  5. Blakeman v. BlakemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. W. T. Grant Co. v. OwensCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1928
  2. M. Rosenberg & Sons, Inc. v. CraftSupreme Court of Virginia · 1944
  3. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. NanceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  4. Newspaper Publishing Corp. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  5. Hines v. GravinsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API