State v. Luscher
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Taylor, C.
The defendant was convicted in the municipal court of the city of Minneapolis of the offense of practicing dentistry without a license, and appeals from an order denying a new trial.
Sections 5015 to 5021 inclusive, of the General Statutes of 1913, contained, the regulations then in force governing the practice of dentistry. Chapter 386, p. 411, Laws of 1919, amended these sections to read as therein set forth and added additional provisions. Defendant contends that chapter 386 violates the equality provisions of both the state and Federal Constitutions and is void.
Sections 1 and 2…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. HackettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- State v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
3Cited by17 opinions
- Mazurek v. Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- State of Minnesota v. Mahdi Hassan AliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. One Oldsmobile Two-Door SedanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
- State v. PehrsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Texas State Board of Dental Examiners v. FenlawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1962
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.