Legal Opinion
Becker v. Detroit Savings Bank
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1934No. Docket No. 77, Calendar No. 38,023PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBhshnell, J.
A mortgage for $28,000 dated November 30, 1931, is secured by a building in the city of Detroit consisting of 27 apartments. The interest payments being in default and 'no moneys having-been paid on the principal, defendant sued plain tiffs on the mortgage note for the full amount of principal and past due interest.
Seeking the aid of the mortgage moratorium statute (Act No. 98, Pub. Acts 1933, as amended by Act No. 20, Pub. Acts 1934 [Ex. Sess.]), and a concurrent resolution of the legislature (Senate concurrent resolution No. 59, Michigan Senate Journal, regular session'of 1933, pp. 1624,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hoyt v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- People v. LowellMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
- Mullan v. StateCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- People v. ToalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by20 opinions
- Franks v. White Pine Copper DivisionMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Boyer-Campbell Co. v. FryMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- State v. A.L.I.V.E. VoluntaryAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Aldrich v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- State Ex Rel. Easbey v. Highway Patrol BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.