Legal Opinion
People v. Wallace
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 24, 1992PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the trial court erred in conducting a portion of his trial in his absence. Before the trial commenced, the court adequately advised defendant of his right to be present at trial and warned him that, if he did not appear at trial, the trial could commence in his absence (see, People v Parker, 57 NY2d 136). On October 2, 1989, defendant appeared for trial and preliminary matters were conducted. Prior to jury selection, defendant advised the court that he did not wish to remain and that he had to drive his girlfriend to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. ParkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. BrooksNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
- People v. BalkumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- People v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. QuaminaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. MaxamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. RoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. GibsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. McGloneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995