People v. Roe
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Goldstein, J.), rendered March 15, 1991, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that the evidence was legally insufficient to support his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree is unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Udzinski, 146 AD2d 245). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. UdzinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- People v. RosarioNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- People v. ThomasNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. CastroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. HaleNew York Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. AntoneddyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. CorporanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. FieldsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.