Legal Opinion

Doon v. Adcock

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1934No. 28943PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This was an action to recover for injuries sustained by plaintiff as the result of a collision between an automobile in which plaintiff was riding and a truck then standing in the highway. The facts alleged by plaintiff in her amended petition without doubt constitute a cause of action. The answer of defendants sets forth in appropriate language, first, a general denial; second, an admission that plaintiff was in an automobile which collided with the rear of the truck; also allegations that the injuries of which plaintiff complains were not caused by the negligence of the defendants or either…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gaines v. WarrickNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Home Fire Insurance v. WeedNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Aspinwall v. SabinNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Joyce v. SprecherNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Lincoln Land Co. v. Commonwealth Oil Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cozad v. McKeoneNebraska Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Stitzel v. Hitchcock CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Federal Farm Mortgage Corp. v. HughesNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Combes v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Blake ex rel. Larsen v. Pathfinder Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API