Legal Opinion
Opincar v. F.J. Spanulo Construction, 91255 (12-4-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 4, 2008No. 91255UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} This cause came to be heard upon the accelerated calendar pursuant to App. R. 11.1 and Loc. R. 11.1, the trial court records, and briefs of counsel.
{¶ 2} Appellants, Thomas and Melanie Opincar (collectively "the Opincars"), appeal the judgment of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas that granted summary judgment in favor of appellee, F.J. Spanulo Construction ("Spanulo"). For the reasons stated herein, we affirm.
{¶ 3} The Opincars hired Spanulo to perform excavation and concrete work for a garage addition on their property. After the garage addition was…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State Ex Rel. Duganitz v. Ohio Adult Parole AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Ekstrom v. Cuyahoga County Community CollegeOhio Court of Appeals · 2002
- State ex rel. Dussell v. Lakewood Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- Gte North, Inc. v. CarrOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Boyd v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2009