Legal Opinion

Marceaux v. Democratic Party

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 28, 2003No. 03-5510PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

Basil J. Marceaux, a Tennessee resident, appeals pro se a district court order denying his motion to reconsider an order denying him pauper status. This case has been referred to a panel of the court pursuant to Rule 34(j)(l), Rules of the Sixth *186Circuit. Upon examination, this panel unanimously agrees that oral argument is not needed. Fed. R.App. P. 34(a).

Marceaux, who describes himself as a Libertarian candidate for governor, submitted a complaint seeking to enjoin members of the Democratic party from reciting the pledge of allegiance. He moved for pauper status. The district court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. Charles W. Sears Real Estate, Inc., Dba Sears Real Estate and Charles W. Sears, Appeal of Charles W. SearsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  2. Kenneth M. Romstadt v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  3. Allen Raymond Phipps v. Phylliss KingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Kareem v. Home Source RentalDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2013
  2. Abdias Paul v. Ogeechee Technical CollegeDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2026
  3. Adriane Potter and George Faris v. Ark Homes for Rent ET-2 LP, et al.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2026
  4. Banks v. WardenDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2020
  5. Brisbon v. Chatham CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2022

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API