Legal Opinion

Craig v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 16, 1976No. Docket Nos. 37300, 37380PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

MOLINARI, P. J.

These proceedings have been consolidated. They involve the same discovery order made in a criminal action. We issued an alternative writ of mandate in each proceeding for the purpose of determining, the specific attacks by the respective petitioners upon certain portions of the trial court’s order for discovery.

*420Petitioner Mario J. Craig, who is charged with a violation of Penal Code section 187 (murder), filed a motion for pretrial discovery requesting discovery of oral and written statements made by any witness to any inspector or attorney of the Alameda County District…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Jones v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Prudhomme v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Middleton v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  3. Robinson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. People v. Superior Court (Alexander)California Court of Appeal · 1995
  5. Breed v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API