Nisbet v. Rhinehart
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.
The defendant has appealed from a judgment rendered in favor of plaintiffs on account of premiums due on three insurance policies, aggregating the sum of $353.21. The complaint alleges that said premiums accrued on three separate policies issued by three separate insurance companies respectively. Said causes of action are identical except as to amounts and dates and the periods covered by the policies of insurance. The complaint does not allege the capacity in which the plaintiffs brought the action, or that there was an assignment of causes of action made by said insurance "companies to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Estate of RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- Abbey Homestead Ass'n v. WillardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1874
- Coglan v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Parker v. ReayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Couson v. WilsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Price v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. Van GordenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Lala v. MaioranaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Servente v. MurrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.