Legal Opinion
Ahlstrom v. Salt Lake City Corp.
Utah Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 2003No. 20010830PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILKINS, Justice:
1 1 Salt Lake City (the "City") appeals the district court's grant of the plaintiffs' (the "Ahlstroms") motion for summary judgment holding that Salt Lake City Police Officer Michelle Ross ("Ross") was acting within the course and scope of her employment when she was involved in an accident while driving a marked patrol car on her commute home to Tooele County. The Ahlstroms have alleged injuries caused by Ross's negligence in connection with the accident. The City contends it cannot be held vicariously liable as Ross's employer for the Ahlstrom's damages. We reverse the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Drake v. Industrial Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1997
- Dimmig v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Clickner v. City of LowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- STATE TAX COM'N v. Industrial Com'n of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Peterson v. Coca-Cola USAUtah Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Salt Lake City Corp. v. Labor CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Newman v. White Water WhirlpoolUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Continental Insurance Co. v. KingstonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
- Newman v. White Water WhirlpoolCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Brown v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.