Legal Opinion

Burnham v. MacWhinnie

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided October 15, 1964No. 5870; No. 3925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrooks, P. J.

This case comes before us on the report established by this Division after plaintiff’s draft report had been disallowed as not conformable to the facts. These facts, as recited in the report, are as follows:

“This is an action of replevin for a certain motor truck, which under the writ, was taken from the defendant. The plaintiff gave a bond to the defendant. The action and bond were filed in court on 5 August 1963, and on that date, the defendant filed an answer. The plaintiff appeared and acted pro se. The .case was marked for hearing for 13 August 1963. The defendant’s attorney and the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Worcester v. Lakeside Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  2. Hollingsworth & Vose Co. v. Foxborough Water Supply DistrictMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. Zwick v. GoldbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  4. Nicolai v. NicolaiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Carroll v. BergerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bougioukas v. MooreMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API