Legal Opinion
Carroll v. Berger
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided February 26, 1926PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.
This is an action on a replevin bond by the plaintiffs, in their position of obligees, against the defendants, as principals and sureties on the bond, for the breach of the condition therein, which reads: “Now if the above bounden Berger et al shall prosecute said action of replevin to final judgment . . . then this obligation shall be void, otherwise it shall remain in full force and virtue.” At the close of the evidence, the defendants filed a written motion for a directed verdict in their favor on the ground that, upon the facts found, no breach of the condition of the replevin bond had…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Corbett v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Reynolds v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
- Tucker v. Tremont Trust Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- Gray v. DeanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Flagg v. TylerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Donnelly v. MontagueMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. PorterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
- Rogan v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Sullivan v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
- Hathaway Bakeries, Inc. v. Labor Relations CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.