Legal Opinion

Goshen Sweeper Co. of Grand Rapids v. Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 9, 1895No. 319PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from tbe Circuit Court of tbe United States for tbe Western District of Michigan. Tbis was a bill in equity by tbe Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Company against the, Goshen Sweeper Company, of Grand Bapids, Micb., for alleged infringement of a patent. Tbe circuit court rendered an interlocutory decree granting an injunction, etc., and defendant appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from tbe Circuit Court of tbe United States for tbe Western District of Michigan. Tbis was a bill in equity by tbe Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Company against the, Goshen Sweeper Company, of Grand Bapids, Micb., for alleged infringement of a patent. Tbe circuit court rendered an interlocutory decree granting an injunction, etc., and defendant appeals. This is a bill for infringement of patent No. 233,371, granted to A. D. Plumb, October 19, 1880, for an improvement in carpet sweepers. The complainant is the Bissell Oarpet-Sweeper Company, assignee of Plumb’s patent; and the defendant is the…

1Opinion of the Court

After stating the foregoing facts, the opinion of the court was announced by

LURTON, Circuit Judge.

If, as contended by the learned counsel for appellant. Plumb’s patent is to be construed as only securing an efficient frictional contact between the driving wheels and the brush shaft, then the field for improvement in frictional devices in sweepers was an exceedingly narrow one. This is abundantly shown by numerous prior patents in evidence. That end was the purpose of so many of these earlier devices, and that result had been secured in so many ways, closely approximating the means adopted by…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Seymour v. OsborneSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Burr v. DuryeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. Roberts v. RyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Eames v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. National Hollow Brake-Beam Co. v. Interchangeable Brake-Beam Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
  2. D'Arcy Spring Co. v. Marshall Ventilated Mattress Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1919
  3. Frederick R. Stearns & Co. v. RussellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1898
  4. Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. Permutit Co. v. WadhamCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1926

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API