Legal Opinion · Dissent

Adoption of C.D.M. v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 4, 2001No. 94,879Published

1Dissent

OPALA, J.,

with whom HARGRAVE, C.J. and LAVENDER, J., join, dissenting.

11 The court holds today that neither a father's incarceration nor his previous court-ordered bar of visitation will provide a defense against a mother's complaint of his wiliful failure to maintain a relationship with his child, a ruling which, pursuant to the terms of 10 O.S. Supp.1998 § 7505-4.2 (H),1 may result in the nonconsensual termination of paternal status. Today's pronouncement is fraught with state and federal constitutional infirmities. Insofar as the court's ruling deprives the father of his interposed defense…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. California v. TrombettaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API