Legal Opinion

Dahlin v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, N.D. Iowa

Decided April 9, 2003No. C01-4120-MWBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PARTIES’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

BENNETT, Chief Judge.

[[Image here]]

I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND

A. Procedural Background

On November 29, 2001, plaintiff Barbara J. Dahlin filed a complaint against Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Met-Life”), to recover long-term disability (“LTD”) benefits under a employee benefits plan provided by MetLife to her former employer. On October 15, 2002, Dah-lin filed a motion for summary judgment. In her motion for summary judgment Dah-lin argues that in this case there is no genuine issue as to any material fact'…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Phil Quick v. Donaldson Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Wal-Mart Associates Health and Welfare PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2004
  2. White v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API