Legal Opinion

Fox v. Ziehme

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 12, 1911No. 1401PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Brror from Pottawatomie County Court; B. D. Reasor, Judge. Action by Albert Ziehme et al., doing business as Ravens-wood Exchange Bank of Chicago, 111., against O. G. Young, Artis Kennedy and Virgil Kennedy, partners, under the firm name of Earlboro Hardware Company, and Pleasant Fox, to recover on certain promissory notes. Judgment for plaintiffs. Pleasant Fox brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

On March 3, 1905, the Ravenswood Exchange Bank of Chicago, Ill., an unincorporated joint-stock company, of which Albert Ziehme was president, began an action in the probate court of Pottawatomie county against O. G. Young, Artis Kennedy, and Virgil Kennedy, partners, doing business under the firm name of Earlboro Hardware Company, and sought thereby to recover certain sums of money, alleged to be due on five promissory notes, given by the said Earlboro Hardware Company, to the St. Louis Jewelry Company, and by it assigned to the said Ravenswood Exchange Bank. On April…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte HudsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Ex Parte HudsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  3. Nelson v. First National Bank of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  4. Betz v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  5. Butt v. CarsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Timmons v. Royal Globe Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. Prowant v. SealySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  3. Pierce v. PierceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
  4. Territory Ex Rel. Johnston v. WoolseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Board of Education of Duncan v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API