Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Hudson
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided March 28, 1910No. A-411PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The decision in this case was filed January 21, 1910. On February 17, 1910, petitioner filed his application for rehearing.
There is no contention made that the original decision is erroneous as to the holding that the act of the Legislature (Sess. Laws 1909, p. 167) providing for the disqualification of judges is in effect notwithstanding the failure of the Legislature to attach the enacting clause. It is urged here that section 5 of this act is in conflict with the Constitution, because it prescribes an unreasonable remedy, which in effect deprives the defendant of his right to a trial…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Beers Ex Rel. Platenius v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1858
- St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. McBrideSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Somerville's Executors v. HamiltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- Shutte v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Blankenship v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Colby v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- Frederick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- Young v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
- Payne v. LeeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.