Legal Opinion

People v. Thomas

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1911PublishedCited by 4 opinions

¡Motion to dismiss indictments for violating section 36 of the Insurance Law.

1Opinion of the CourtBlanchard, J.

This is a motion to dismiss certain indictments against the defendants. The indictments, four in number, set forth different sets of transactions, all of which, it is claimed by the people, are violations of section 36 of the Insurance Law. They set forth that the defendants, as officers, directors and stockholders of the Provident Life Assurance Association, caused deposits to be made in certain banks and that prior to and thereafter, upon the strength of these deposits and in consideration therefor, procured loans to be made by which, directly or indirectly, they profited. Section 36 of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boughton v. . FlintNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Payne v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. Hunt v. HopleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
  4. Allibone v. AmesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Dorman v. GannonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Citrin v. BelcastroNew York Family Court · 1949
  2. People v. Art Steel Co.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1986
  3. People v. KellyNew York City Magistrates' Court · 1953
  4. Consolidated Mutual Insurance v. KeepnewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API