Legal Opinion
People v. Art Steel Co.
Criminal Court of the City of New York
Decided November 25, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harvey M. Sklaver, J.
Defendants Alexander Burger and Irwin Goldfeder are charged with having violated Labor Law § 198-c, in that Art Steel Company, Inc. (Art Steel), a corporation in which they were officers, willfully failed to pay supplemental wage benefits.1 They now move to dismiss the information pursuant to (i) CPL 170.30 (1) (a) on the grounds that the information is defective under 170.35 (1) (a) and 170.35 (1) (c) and (ii) CPL 170.40 in furtherance of justice.
Before enumerating the issues raised, it will be helpful to set forth the facts, all of which are…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MorashMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- People v. Vanguard Meter Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1994