Legal Opinion

Quinn v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided January 16, 1990No. Record No. 0975-88-3PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLEMAN, J.

Reginald Hubert Quinn was convicted of refusing to permit the taking of samples of either his blood or breath in violation of the Virginia implied consent law, Code § 18.2-268(B) and (T). At trial, Quinn attempted to call two witnesses who would have testified that he appeared to be sober and operated his vehicle proficiently just before he was involved in the accident that resulted in the charge of driving while intoxicated. The trial court refused to admit this testimony, ruling that evidence concerning his sobriety was immaterial on the issue whether refusal of the blood…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brooks v. City of Newport NewsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1982
  2. Hoyle v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Driver v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1988
  4. City of Virginia Beach v. ReneauSupreme Court of Virginia · 1977
  5. Raymond v. Department of Motor VehiclesNebraska Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Cash v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1996
  2. Toro v. City of NorfolkCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  3. Henry Magruder Williams v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2002
  4. Bristol v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006
  5. Bristol v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API