Tasler v. Peerless Tire Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county. The facts are stated in the opinion. Defendants’ demurrer to the complaint was overruled. From, an order, Jelley, J., appointing George R. Smith temporary receiver of defendant corporation, defendants, except N. W. White and G. L. Hicks, appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHallam, J.
The complaint alleges that the defendant Peerless Tire Company was organized under the laws of South Dakota; that the office and principal place of business of the corporation are located in Minneapolis, Minnesota ; that plaintiffs are the holders of preferred stock in the corporation; that defendant Hicks is the secretary; Meek, the president; Fay, the treasurer, and Scott, the vice president, of the corporation, and the other defendants are past officers and business managers of the corporation; that said defendants organized the corporation for the purpose of defrauding plaintiffs and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jones v. MorrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- North State Copper & Gold Mining Co. v. FieldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
- Guilford v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
- Republican Mountain Silver Mines, Ltd. v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1893
- Rothwell v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Seitz v. MichelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- Backus v. FinkelsteinDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Weede v. Iowa Southern Utilities Co. of DelawareSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Seitz v. Union Brass & Metal Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Morton v. Morton Realty Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1925
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.