Legal Opinion

George J. Grant Const. Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 13, 1953No. 46890PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MADDEN, Judge.

The plaintiffs, as joint venturers, made a contract with the Government to construct for it three hemp mills at three separate places in Minnesota. The contract price was a lump sum of $301,800, plus unit prices to be paid for work not included in the base bid. The contract was executed on behalf of the Government through the Commodity Credit Corporation, acting on behalf of the Defense Plant Corporation. Both were agencies of the Government.

The contract was dated May IS, 1943. It provided that work should commence 7 days after the date of the contract, and be completed within…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. WunderlichSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. United States v. MoormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. United States v. AmesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1845

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buckley & Co., Inc. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  2. Tenaska Washington Partners, L.P. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  3. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API