Legal Opinion

Tenaska Washington Partners, L.P. v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided November 9, 1995No. 95-420CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

This case is before the court after argument on defendant’s motion to dismiss or stay and to compel arbitration and plaintiffs cross-motion to enforce the parties’ arbitration agreement if they are required to arbitrate their dispute. A partnership seeks to hold the Bonneville Power Administration, an agency within the Department of Energy, liable for breach of a written contract to develop electrical power, including construction of a power plant. The Government terminated the contract after construction began, but before the power plant was built. At issue is whether,…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Electronic Privacy Information Center v. Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. County of Santa Clara v. TrumpDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2017
  3. Frillz, Inc. v. LaderDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1996
  4. Authority of the United States to Enter Settlements Limiting the Future Exercise of Executive Branch Discretion, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel1999
  5. Electric Lightwave, Inc. v. RichardsonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API