Forin v. City of Duluth
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for St. Louis county, Ensign, J., vacating a judgment in favor of plaintiff.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action to recover $600 and interest for the plaintiff’s services as health officer of the village of West Duluth. The summons was served on the mayor of the defendant city by the attorneys of the plaintiff on February 4, 1896, as appears from the affidavit of service, and in the forenoon of February 26 judgment was entered by default for the full amount claimed. The next day the defendant' obtained from the trial court an order, returnable February 29, for the plaintiff to show cause why the judgment should not be vacated, and the defendant permitted to answer. The *55¡matter was heard on the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Sheldon v. RisedorphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
3Cited by6 opinions
- Peterson v. W. Davis & SonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Grady v. Maurice L. Rothschild & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- O'BRIEN v. KemperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Crane & Ordway Co. v. SauntrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Clifford v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.