Legal Opinion

Okin v. Railway Express Agency

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 8, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Burling, C. C. J. and S. 0. C.

Motion has been made by the plaintiffs for an order:(a) Striking out, severally and jointly:

“A. The entire answer;
“B. The general denial contained in the answer;
“C. Each affirmative or separate defense contained in the answer.”

Upon the following grounds:

“1. That same are untrue in fact and sham.
“2. That same are insufficient in law to constitute a defense or defenses to the complaint.
“3. That same are frivolous.
“4. That same are repetitious.
“5. That same are argumentative.
“6. That same are so framed as to embarrass or delay a fair trial.”(b) And for summary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Joseph Mogul, Inc. v. C. Lewis Lavine, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Rolla Produce Co. v. American Railway Express Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Herrick v. GallagherNew York Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Auto Brokerage Co. v. UllrichSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  5. Kammerer v. SchutenNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. National Van Lines, Inc. v. Rich Plan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
  2. Herrin Transportation Co. v. Robert E. Olson Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  3. Littleton Stamp and Coin Co., Inc. v. Delta Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
  4. Willer v. Railway Exp. Agency, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API