Perez v. Roadway Express, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
KATZ, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are Defendant Unions’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 16), Defendant Roadway’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 19) and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Relief From Stay (Doc. No. 24). For the following reasons, the Court will deny Plaintiffs’ motion and grant Defendants’ motions.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Scherry Perez and Christine Garrett, proceeding pro se, were employed by Defendant Roadway Express, Inc. (“Roadway”) as dockworkers when laid off in January 14, 2001. Both filed grievances with Defendant Unions, asserting that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Local Lodge No. 1424, International Ass'n of MacHinists v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Dasgupta v. University of Wisconsin Board of RegentsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
- Fox v. Parker Hannifin Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bloedow v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2004
- Dudich v. United Auto Workers Local, Union No. 1250District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2006